See here. Would love thoughts.
I like it! But a better question is whether the template works for your audience (e.g. the pitch is actually written, properly read and understood in your current format). I’m pretty sure pitches are different/unique in every Shape Up implementation. For example, we don’t have an OKR section because we usually describe the importance of a problem in our Problem section.
Personally, I’m a fan of brevity. Fewer sections means less to write and less to read, but whatever works best for your audience, go with that.
Thanks for looking at the pitch mod, @nt-from-chicago. I agree with your points for sure. Every team is different.
Original link broke. Here is an updated version of the pitch template.
Thanks for the link update!
Regarding feedback:
I really liked the intro section.
But in general, it is a little bit too much detail for our case.
Not sure what you mean about too much detail. Each section has a lot of description, so it looks long, but a final product someone might fill out for their feature would render a pretty concise document. Some sections are optional too, e.g., FAQs and milestones…